An applicant needs screening against an agreed, reviewable rubric.
AI agents
Screening worker
Scheduling worker
Candidate care worker
Human decisions
Recruiter
Hiring manager
Workflow steps
1
AcknowledgeCandidate care worker
2
ScreenScreening worker
3
RecordScreening worker
4
Recruiter reviewRecruiter
5
ScheduleScheduling worker
6
Send candidate updateCandidate care worker
4 operating rules · 4 decision rules · 5 channels · records to verify
Illustrative design. Systems, permissions, human coverage and outcomes must be configured and validated for your deployment.
THE RESULT TO CHECK
A screening record and interview request for recruiter review. Hiring decisions remain human judgments.
On this page
Where recruiting work gets held up
Give recruiters more time for candidate conversations and decisions. Voxistry AI workers collect answers to approved job-related questions, respond to process enquiries and coordinate interview requests through connected systems. Recruiters see the available answers, participation requests and unfinished follow-up in one reviewable record.
Candidate answers arrive across forms, calls and messages, leaving recruiters to reconstruct the same job-related information.
Incomplete answers, opt-outs and accommodation requests need a clear recruiter path rather than being treated as negative indicators.
Interview scheduling consumes recruiter time across candidate and panel availability, with uncertain saves and unavailable slots needing follow-up.
Fictional example: an unavailable interview slot
For one role, a candidate provides answers and requests Tuesday at 10:00. The answers are saved, a recruiter approves an interview, then the preferred panel slot becomes unavailable before confirmation. The interview and invitation remain unconfirmed.
01
Save the candidate's answers
The screening worker saves the candidate-provided answers against the approved job-related questions. An incomplete answer or opt-out remains visible for recruiter review and is not treated as a negative candidate indicator.
02
Check the approved Tuesday request
The recruiter approves an interview for the role. The scheduling worker requests Tuesday at 10:00, but the preferred panel slot becomes unavailable before confirmation. The record shows no booked slot and no delivered invitation.
03
Return alternate-time follow-up to staff
The recruiter receives the saved answers and unavailable-slot context to choose an alternate time. If no recruiter accepts that follow-up, the named recruiting fallback keeps it pending; attendance and hiring decisions remain separate human outcomes.
What a first pilot should improve
Agree the outcomes with your recruiting team and compare them with your current process.
Capture candidate-provided answers against the approved job-related questions and show incomplete or opted-out items for recruiter review.
Submit permitted interview scheduling requests against configured availability, distinguishing requested, saved, accepted and confirmed slots from invitation delivery and attendance.
Give recruiters useful process context and candidate-provided information while they own advancement, rejection, accommodations and alternate participation paths.
Who handles the work
Example division of work between AI workers and your team.
AI worker
Screening worker
Asks approved job-related questions and records candidate-provided answers and unanswered items.
Rubric coverage and capture
Acts within policy — asks only approved criteria questions
AI worker
Scheduling worker
Requests permitted slots against candidate and panel availability, then records save, acceptance, confirmation and invitation states.
Interview logistics
Acts within policy — books only into permitted panel slots
AI worker
Candidate care worker
Answers approved process and role questions and records opt-outs, accommodation requests and open follow-up.
Candidate experience
Acts within policy — approved role and process content only
Human owner
Recruiter
Reviews candidate-provided answers, decides advancement or rejection and arranges alternate participation paths.
Recruiter decisions and candidate support
Full authority
Human owner
Hiring manager
Owns role assessment, interview judgement and the hiring decision.
Hiring decision
Full authority
How the work could flow
Use this sequence to agree the workflow and test each step before launch.
01Candidate care worker
Acknowledge
Which role and approved process information apply, and does the candidate request an alternate path?
02Screening worker
Screen
Which approved job-related questions have candidate-provided answers, and what remains incomplete or opted out?
03Screening worker
Record
Was the candidate-provided record saved, and which gaps or requests need recruiter review?
04Recruiter
Recruiter review
What recruiter decision and candidate support path are requested next?
05Scheduling worker
Schedule
Which permitted slot is requested, saved, accepted and confirmed, and was the invitation delivered?
06Candidate care worker
Send candidate update
Is a candidate update or staff follow-up due, and was the intended process message delivered?
Decisions your team keeps
Proposed operating requirements to configure and verify, including what happens when a system or human handoff is unavailable.
No worker advances, rejects, or ranks a candidate — screening produces a record, not a decision.
Screening questions are limited to the approved, job-related rubric agreed with the hiring team.
Agree which screening responses and rubric notes should be retained, with appropriate access and retention settings, so recruiters can review the available record.
Incomplete answers, opt-outs and accommodation requests remain visible for recruiter review and are not negative candidate indicators.
Job-related questions only, from an approved rubric, with no inferred candidate attributes.
Advancement and rejection require the agreed human recruiter review.
Retain the configured candidate-provided record for recruiter review with appropriate access and retention settings.
Route accommodation, accessibility and alternate participation requests to the recruiter-owned process.
The Voxistry tools behind this workflow
Explore how the selected tools support this candidate-screening process, then confirm the actions and records your setup can provide.
Agent Studio
Run approved job-related question flows and capture candidate-provided answers without ranking or rejection.
Select and validate the required provider pathways.
Voice
WhatsApp
SMS
Web chat
Email
What to measure
Pilot measurement definitions, not claimed customer results.
Application to reviewable record
Answer capture time
Measure time from application or enquiry to a record containing the candidate-provided answers and any unanswered or opted-out items for recruiter review.
Approved questions recorded
Question coverage
Measure whether the approved job-related questions were presented and which answers remain incomplete; a rubric alone does not establish fairness or compliance.
Request to confirmed slot
Scheduling state
Track requested, saved, accepted and confirmed slots separately from invitation delivery and attendance.
Start with one role
01Stage 1
One high-volume role
Start with one role and approved job-related questions. Recruiters review records, incomplete answers and opt-outs before adding volume.
02Stage 2
Add scheduling and candidate care
Connect permitted panel calendars and messages. Measure requested, saved, accepted and confirmed slots separately from invitation delivery and attendance.
03Stage 3
Extend the role families
Extend to adjacent role families only after fresh recruiter review of questions, records, alternate paths and connected-system permissions.